333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345
| |

preparation of this paper. This is founded on the fact that reflection from surfaces in motion varies from the ordinary laws of reflection. Let ab (fig. 1) be a plane wave falling on the mirror mn at an incidence of 45°. If the mirror is at rest, the wave front after reflection will be ac. Now suppose the mirror to move in a direction which makes an angle a with its normal, with a velocity a). Let Y be the velocity of light in the ether supposed stationary, and let cd be the increase in the distance the light has to travel to reach d. cd In this time the mirror will have moved a distance —--. 4/2 cos a „ . cd a) a/2 cos a . . , ^ , ac We have—7 = —-which put = r, and —7= 1— r. ad Y ad In order to find the new wave front, draw the arc fg with b as a center and ad as radius; the tangent to this arc from d will be the new wave front, and the normal to the tangent from b will be the new direction. This will differ from the direction ba by the angle d which it is required to find. 'From the equality of the triangles adb and edb it follows that d=2<p / tan aab= tan I 45--— I =-:—^ =1—r, 1— tan — ad 1+ tan -g- or neglecting terms of the order r
0 = r+ y = -y--h y5 Now let the light fall on a parallel mirror facing the first, we should then have 0 viation would be 0+0/ The arrangement of apparatus might be as in fig. 2; s in the focus of the lens a, is a slit; bb cc are two glass mirrors optically plane and so silvered as to allow say one-twentieth of the light to pass through, and reflecting say ninety per cent. The intensity of the light falling on the observing telescope df |